Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 7 Nomor 4, Agustus 2010 | Perpustakaan Universitas Bhayangakara Jakarta Raya
Advanced SearchJurnal Konstitusi Volume 7 Nomor 4, Agustus 2010
Informasi Detil
| Volume |
Volume 7 Nomor 4, Agustus 2010
|
|---|---|
| Penerbit | Mahkamah Konstitusi : jakarta., 2010 |
| ISSN |
1829-7706
|
| Subyek |
Artikel Jurnal
| Judul | Abstract | Halaman |
|---|---|---|
| Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme | The Constitution not only contains the highest norm but is also the constitutional guidelines for its citizens (the people) in society and state. The Constitution must internalized consciously in the behaviorof social life for the people and state sovereignty, as a shareholder. The Constitution of 1945 states the limitation of power, basis on the distribution of power. the Power should not be centered in one hand (concetration of power). The essence of constitutionalism is aimed at limiting the power of the state. In other words, the concept of constitutionalism means the limited government. | 1-8 |
| Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan | Review the constitutionality of laws as required under rule of law and democracy are delegated to the Constitutional Court by constitution. In practice, the Constitutional Court was trying to fill the gaps and needs of the law, so the court can provide the jutice that many people expected. Access for judicial review was possible by interpreting the phrase "Act" in Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution in terms of material and formal as well as by reason of the substance of lagislation under the Act, in fact become the substance of the Act, thus although it was not formally established by the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President, in substance the material law is a law. | 9-48 |
| Problematika Tugas Konstitusional Komisi Yudisial | Jabatan hakim di satu sisi merupakan jabatan yang sangat mulia, dan si sisi lain, jika tidak hati-hati, dapat merendahkan martabatnya karena banyak godaan yang siap menjerumuskannya. Sebagaimana diketahui jabatan Hakim boleh dikatakan merupakan jabatan yang dekat sekali dengan godaan-godaan duniawi. Betapa tidak, di tangan seorang hakim nasib dan masa depan seseorang akan ditentukan. Orang yang tadinya kaya raya dan terkenal sebagai donator di lingkungannya misalnya, tiba-tiba jatuh martabatnya sebagai manusia karena masuk penjara akibat putusan hakim. Oleh karena itu sudah menjadi suatu pandangan umum apabila orang yang berurusan dengan pengadilan akan berusaha semaksimal mungkin, dengan segala cara (baca menghalalkan segala cara) melakukan segala hal asalkan putusan hakim dapat berpihak kepadanya. | 49-60 |
| Wacana Constitutional Questions dalam Situs Mahkamah: Konteks e-Deliberative Democracy | Pertengahan akhir tahun 2010 ini terdapati perkara yang menyita perhatian publik ditingkat nasional seperti putusan dalam perkara permohonan Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Muatan putusan menggunakan pola deduktif-matematis dari jurisprudence (ajaran hukum) yang menghasilkan keputusan "Konstitusional bersyarat" (conditionally constitutional) atas ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat (1) UU Kejaksaan. Teks putusan itu diikuti pula dengan pendapat berbeda (dissenting opinion) dari 2 (dua) hakim MK yang masing-masing mencerminkan realisme hukum (legal realism). Logika | 61-90 |
| Perlindungan Hak Anak terhadap Iklan Rokok yang Tidak Memperagakan Wujud Rokok | The decision of Constitutional-Court No. 6/PUU - VII / 2009 (about cigarettes Promoting Limitation) to make the promotion of cigarette more clear in action, without6 manifesting it as a legal advertisement (46 verse (3) UU. No. 32, 2002). Although the cigarette advertisement is not along with the cigarettes appearance, it still has a huge effect for children. In this circumstance, an attractive debate will rise up between the economic orientation of the cigarettes entrepreneur and the Childrens Right-Commission purpose. Both of them also get the protection as an expression of constitutional right6 (27 and 28 A, verse (2) UUD 1945). then over here there is an important meaning of Constitutional - Courts decision No. 6 /PUU - VII / 2009, which gives an answer of the laws issue wherher a cigarette advertisement without the appearance, it still also seize the childrens constitutional right. | 91-112 |
| Penerapan Konsep Konstitusi Hijau (Green Constitution) di Indonesia Sebagai Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup | Global environmental issue related to state responsibility in protection and management of environment is consider by a develop and development state earlier. The new concept related to it is regulate environment right in constitution. Green Constitution concept is on of solution for answering the concern by a people to environmental function degradation. Indonesia already regulate the environmental issues in constitution as human right. As a comparation study, a republic of Ecuador is one of the state famous as a first state which put the protection of environment in the constitution. Provision of protection and management of environment in Indonesia must regulate in clear in Indonesia Constitution, a lot of human activity cause the degradation and pollution that threat the human being and the next generation. The change of Indonesia Constitution is one of solution for praotection of environment in the future, so the law and other regulatin will be source to the constitution and oriented to the preservation of environment function. | 113-130 |
| Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden Menurut UUD 1945 (Antara Realitas Politik dan Penegakan Konstitusi) | The Inquiry rights was the implementation of the oversight function of House Representative (DPR) to Presiden/and or Vice President. depend onreality and political consensus of the DPR, so there are possibilities and tendencies that the rule of law and democracy are not be able to maintained as stipulated in Article 1 the 1945 Constitution. The decree of impeachment of the President and/or Vice President as provide in the 1945 Constitution tend unable to uphold the rule of law when the Constitutional Court decided the President and/or Vice President violated the constitution, namely the dismissal of the President and or the Vice President made by the Assembly through a political decision (politeke beslssing). The efforts to maintains consistency of the concept of law as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3), Article 7B paragraph (3) and paragraph (7) of the 1945 Constitution, without opening the chance intervention of political interests and obligations of the Assembly to implement the decision of the Constitutional Court. Therefore, the rule of law must be a cornerstone in the practice of constitutional law in Indonesia. | 131-158 |
| Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengadili Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada | This letters have a purpose to know and analyze authority basic Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia to judging the dispute from the results of district leader and district proxy leader election, and then transferring background about the authority to judging the dispute from the Results of District Leader and District Proxy Leader Election from Appellate Court to Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia. So, to analyze basic of Constitution Lawcourt consideration that dispute objects of results of district leader and district proxy leader election dont have the quantitative character only based on calculation voice results, but the qualitative character too, namely breaking the rules to general election principles, with the character likes ahead, general, free, secret, then downright and fairly thats to influence the results of district leader and district proxy leader election. Analyze the election law is used by Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia to judging the dispute in Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 24 Tahun 2003 about Constitution Lawcourt of Republic of Indonesia or Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 12 Tahun 2008 about Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 32 Tahun 2008 about District Governance, do not regulate punish the dispute event of district leader and district proxy leader election results. | 159-178 |